In the raging federal health care debate, numbers are turning out to be some of the most partisan tools available to Democrats, Republicans and everyone with a stake in the game.
Indiana residents have gotten a rare look at the spinning of statistics and price tags that happens regularly in government, as Gov. Mike Pence’s point man on federal health care estimated that residents would pay 72 percent more for health insurance through the insurance exchange being built.
That, of course, is an incredible simplification of an incredibly complex topic, something Democratic supporters of President Barack Obama’s signature legislation pointed out shortly afterward and followed with some spin of their own.
Add to an already confusing mix of cutoffs, dependents, income brackets, co-pays and credits, and both sides will find plenty to support whatever conclusion they like.
The Pence administration, which has opposed the health care law while readying for its implementation over the next few months, found numbers that confirm its bias.
“The Affordable Care Act requires many Hoosiers to purchase more comprehensive and more expensive health insurance than they may want or need,” said Logan Harrison, deputy commissioner at the Indiana Department of Insurance, in a statement announcing the assumed rate hike. “These rates call into question just how affordable health insurance will really be for many Hoosiers.”
The state did not release the data on how it came up with this estimate, but The Washington Post reported this was likely the result of “squishing” together all the plans that would be available to Indiana residents, from the cheapest “bronze” plan to the most expensive “gold” option, and coming up with one number.
Get ready for more blurring of the lines as the long, drawn-out, political clash stretches through its fourth year. And not just from Republican opponents.