In order to favorably sway public opinion, is it really outlandish or alarmist to make the logical conclusion these two entertainment titans and others will not find ways to justify their behavior and skewer everyone who thinks otherwise as dimwitted moralists and enemies of the Constitution? After all, the thousands upon thousands who vote with their dollars are sending the clear message about the lifestyles they support.
Separate the “art” from the artists all you want, but the artists can still afford more than enough alcohol, drugs and children to satiate all the deviant desires they want.
Charles A. Layne
Ind. doesn’t commit to sexual education
Complaints about abortion providers uncovered a few tardy reports of abortions of 13-year-olds. Pregnancy in 13-year-olds is always unfortunate.
Indiana deems mutual consent between 13-year-olds invalid. Neither is considered a victim of rape; it is mutual abuse. Without knowing the partner’s age, it’s not correct to say a 13-year-old girl was a “victim of rape,” as activists and journalists have done.
Dr. Klopfer sometimes informs parents that neighboring states have different reporting laws. Reporting 13-year-olds can be harmful, carrying risk of suicide, violence, and creating barriers to health care. The position of the Society of Adolescent Medicine is that mandatory reporting laws based only on age are detrimental and sexual activity shouldn’t be presumed sexually abusive.
The problem isn’t abortion providers. The problem is the state doesn’t commit to 13-year-olds’ sexuality education, health care and opportunity.
Sue Ellen Braunlin, M.D.
Indiana ReligiousCoalition for Reproductive Justice