Turbine opponents: Here’s some advice
Would those protesting the wind farms remember that they do not own the view out their windows? That’s another person’s land down the road. They have the right to improve it if they follow the rules.
Just because you do not like what your neighbor proposes building does not give you a veto over his land. Nor does filling a hearing room with your friends and neighbors make you a majority empowered to demand the officials run roughshod over the rights of your neighbor down the road.
The officials you are speaking to always have three audiences in any land use issue. There are the petitioners seeking to change something; their neighbors who will have to live with any changes; and the greater community. All have their rights and needs, which require respect and consideration.
Protesters wanting to influence officials need to organize. Nothing will alienate officials faster than their listening to a crowd for hours where the speakers keep repeating the same statements in slightly different wording.
Have a spokesperson or two make an organized presentation. They can ask for supporters to stand or raise their hands. If this is a second hearing on the matter, then summarize your previous statements and present any new information you may have found.
The protesters need to present facts and not rumors or fears. Large wind turbines have been around for a couple decades. Someone somewhere should have studied the wind farm’s community impact after a couple years of wind farm operations using scientific methods and published their findings in a peer reviewed journal.
Yet, several organizations have reported searching for such a study and not finding any. Similarly, reporters (and their supporting editors) from a local or regional newspaper serving the wind farm’s area should have published articles reporting on the community effects of the wind farm, now that the community has lived with them for several years. They could interview some of the wind farm protesters to see if they had had any of the health issues they claimed would be caused by wind farms. They could interview local health departments, Realtors, and school administrators for evidence of harm from the wind farm. Just remember that anything published without the benefit of professional editorial review is suspect.
Keep in mind officials do not have a magic wand hidden somewhere. They cannot bring it out, wave it and make your problem go away. Land use law has been fought over for well over a century by legislators and in the courts. Making changes to the laws takes time and must follow specific procedures.
Making changes after someone has filed a proposal for something permitted and the community decides they would rather not see is not permitted under Indiana law. You can change the law for future petitioners, just not for the current ones.
Still, if the protesters are really committed, they could just file a proposal for amending the county zoning ordinance. You will need to prepare a specific proposal, fill out an application, pay any filing fees, pay the advertising costs, distribute any hearing notices, and show up at the public hearing to present your case. Just remember that state and federal law and court decisions may require changes to your proposal, and others can propose other changes at the public hearing.
If all else fails, plant some trees between you and the wind turbines. Eventually, they will grow to block your view of the wind turbines. If enough of you plant enough trees, you may even create enough wind turbulence to render the area unsuitable for wind turbines.
Turbine opponents: Here’s some advice
Letters to the Editor: Dec. 4, 2013
We as a nation continue to engage in a war on drugs, which is predominately focused on arrests for marijuana, that violates our basic civil rights.
Letters to the Editor: Dec. 3, 2013
A recent opinion page article concerned the private lives of ‘social reformers’ not equalling the movement they championed.
- Dec. 1, 2013: Letters to the editor CRD turbine foes not against Chrysler Contrary to what Anabeth Rayl wrote in her letter, the Tipton County Citizens for Responsible Development were not involved in the dispute over the waiver of a permit fee for Chrysler protested by three individua
- Nov. 29, 2013: Letters to the editor Turbine proponent misses letter's point Ms. Rayl's assertion that Chrysler is in the crosshairs of industrial wind turbine opponents was a gross misrepresentation of the focus of my previous opinion letter. I can only speak for my intent and not for
- Nov. 28, 2013: Letters to the editor Tipton County gov't isn't 'for the people' Recent news reporting indicated the Tipton County commissioners eliminated a $21,000 building permit fee for Chrysler's new transmission factory. (Chrysler did not request it.) But they refused to eliminate
- Nov. 26, 2013: Letters to the editor Kokomo requires more tornado sirens Come on, Kokomo. Don't wait any longer! We don't want another Washington, Ill., again! Before we retired and moved to Texas, there was talk about sirens, and I hear there's talk again now! Go ahead, get them. Most
- Nov. 27, 2013: Letters to the editor World 'trying to turn its back on God' President Obama couldn't make it out to Gettysburg, Pa., for the 150th anniversary of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address because of a scheduling conflict. He was asked by filmmaker Ken Burns, who was making a document
- Nov. 25, 2013: Letters to the editor 'The most amazing group of people' I would like to sincerely thank the Kokomo Police Department for the amazing job they did Sunday, Nov. 17, and all these days following. My daughter, who has special needs, lives in a staffed home with two other in
- Nov. 24, 2013: Letters to the editor Food pantry offers little in nutrition Food pantries. Also known as food banks. They are organized to provide a source of food for those of us down on our luck for whatever reason and however long. I am one of those who found himself in such a positi
- Nov. 22, 2013: Letters to the editor County's selective enforcement of fees The Tipton County commissioners have waived the building permit fee for Chrysler. Mr. VanBibber stated he recognized not everyone would agree and that the commissioners would "take the criticism." How could anyo
- More Letters Headlines
- Letters to the Editor: Dec. 4, 2013