Setback rules apply only to housing
A recent letter to the editor implied that you will no longer be able to build structures on your property if the proposed building is within the setback distance to wind turbines. Mr. Salsbery’s concern is certainly valid and should be addressed, so I looked up the ordinance online.
It is important for everyone to know the truth about the building ordinances in Tipton County, and the only way to truly know the meaning of the language is to read the text. What I read in the ordinance and what Mr. Salsbery was apparently told are two different things.
To give those in attendance the benefit of the doubt, perhaps those members and staff at the planning commission meeting did not have their code book in front of them or misunderstood the question when giving the answer. The truth is that the setback rules apply only to residential structures. A simple review of the ordinance (available on the county’s website) in Section 522.07, page 5-58, clearly states the setback requirement only applies to “Residential dwellings.”
In other words, structures used to house humans cannot be erected in the setback area without BZA approval. However, other structures, including barns, pole barns, sheds, lean-tos, garages, swimming pools, hot tubs, decks, gazebos, etc., can be erected, as long as the owner applies for a regular building permit that would have been required regardless of setback rules — certainly not an undue hardship.
A special exception that must be brought before the BZA is not required for these structures.
Of course, the structure requiring the regular building permit would also have to meet the structural quality standards set out in the code. In plain written language, you have not totally “lost the right to use of your land as you desire” as implied. I believe this clarification is important.
Gary David, Tipton
Some Tipton farmers ‘blinded by dollars’
My father, as a young man, grew up on his father’s farm. I grew up when farmers worked with neighboring farmers, and had each others interests at heart.
This new generation of farmers are different! They receive large subsidies from the government (our tax dollars). I have no problem with that! I like cheap food in this country.
Where I really part company with these farmers is when, for a little money — $10,000 to $12,000 per turbine, per year — they no longer think of themselves or their neighbors, in the long run! They’re blinded by dollars!
They don’t know that seed companies will no longer have them plant seed corn or seed beans on their property because the pollen will travel 1 to 3 miles from a wind turbine! Do your homework, farmers. I did!
Farmers, your greed has put us in this position! You know who you are! You have split Tipton County in half over this issue. You’ve caused heartache and pain to your neighbors — for a few extra bucks!
Wake up! This is some of the richest soil in the country. Why put wind turbines on it?
Jim Leffler, Tipton
Setback rules apply only to housing
Letters to the Editor: Dec. 4, 2013
We as a nation continue to engage in a war on drugs, which is predominately focused on arrests for marijuana, that violates our basic civil rights.
Letters to the Editor: Dec. 3, 2013
A recent opinion page article concerned the private lives of ‘social reformers’ not equalling the movement they championed.
- Dec. 1, 2013: Letters to the editor CRD turbine foes not against Chrysler Contrary to what Anabeth Rayl wrote in her letter, the Tipton County Citizens for Responsible Development were not involved in the dispute over the waiver of a permit fee for Chrysler protested by three individua
- Nov. 29, 2013: Letters to the editor Turbine proponent misses letter's point Ms. Rayl's assertion that Chrysler is in the crosshairs of industrial wind turbine opponents was a gross misrepresentation of the focus of my previous opinion letter. I can only speak for my intent and not for
- Nov. 28, 2013: Letters to the editor Tipton County gov't isn't 'for the people' Recent news reporting indicated the Tipton County commissioners eliminated a $21,000 building permit fee for Chrysler's new transmission factory. (Chrysler did not request it.) But they refused to eliminate
- Nov. 26, 2013: Letters to the editor Kokomo requires more tornado sirens Come on, Kokomo. Don't wait any longer! We don't want another Washington, Ill., again! Before we retired and moved to Texas, there was talk about sirens, and I hear there's talk again now! Go ahead, get them. Most
- Nov. 27, 2013: Letters to the editor World 'trying to turn its back on God' President Obama couldn't make it out to Gettysburg, Pa., for the 150th anniversary of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address because of a scheduling conflict. He was asked by filmmaker Ken Burns, who was making a document
- Nov. 25, 2013: Letters to the editor 'The most amazing group of people' I would like to sincerely thank the Kokomo Police Department for the amazing job they did Sunday, Nov. 17, and all these days following. My daughter, who has special needs, lives in a staffed home with two other in
- Nov. 24, 2013: Letters to the editor Food pantry offers little in nutrition Food pantries. Also known as food banks. They are organized to provide a source of food for those of us down on our luck for whatever reason and however long. I am one of those who found himself in such a positi
- Nov. 22, 2013: Letters to the editor County's selective enforcement of fees The Tipton County commissioners have waived the building permit fee for Chrysler. Mr. VanBibber stated he recognized not everyone would agree and that the commissioners would "take the criticism." How could anyo
- More Letters Headlines
- Letters to the Editor: Dec. 4, 2013