County population too big for turbines
I am a citizen of eastern Howard County and have attended the last three Howard County commissioners’ meetings. Two meetings were so crowded that many had to stand. In all three, the room was packed. The major topic has been whether industrial wind turbines should come to eastern Howard County. I want to give you, the people who comprise “the court of public opinion,” a synopsis of what I’ve heard and concluded from the meetings.
The meetings have been overwhelmingly composed of opponents who live near the proposed wind “farm” in eastern Howard County, including me. Petitions were presented with hundreds of signatures opposing the wind installation. In my neighborhood I found only one household out of at least 25 that wants the wind farm. The opposition has repeatedly told the commissioners that we do not oppose alternative energy, but defend our quality of life. When the commissioners were asked if they would like to have a wind farm 1,250 feet from their residences, they were dead silent and gave no reply.
Only a few spoke in favor of the proposed wind farm, and all but one expect to receive financial compensation. Most are leaseholders with E.ON, and one was an E.ON employee. Another who spoke for the wind “farm” has never actually lived by one. As we opponents are basing opinions on negative information, she is believing positive information. If the opposition is right, her quality of life will also be harmed. By then, however, it will be too late for everyone.
In my research I’ve found profuse negative testimonials from those living near wind turbines worldwide. People describe wind turbines ruining their quality of life. Many have testified these negative effects are cumulative, and these testimonials were presented to the commissioners. But they still want to hear from people in our area.
This is impossible since Howard County has no wind farm yet. Names and phone numbers of people living near Wildcat Phase I were given to the commissioners. These residents are willing to talk about their negative experiences, but only one thus far has been called.
A leaseholder at one meeting said he had the best interest of the county at heart when he signed his contract, hoping for more revenue in the county — even though he did not relish farming under the wind turbines. He encouraged the commissioners to “do the right thing” for all concerned.
A Tipton County leaseholder admitted that farmers have always gotten along financially and could get along in the future with or without wind farm revenue. Yet another leaseholder tried to debunk a DVD made available by the opposition. But he failed to mention the study he was “debunking” stated at the end that it’s “positive” findings were inconclusive.
One commissioner stated he was not a proponent of wind energy; he signed the contract in 2009 to help the county’s economy, as Kokomo was rated “a dying city”. He explained that Howard County has since recovered economically, which means it recovered without wind farm revenues. Another commissioner did not sign the contract because his company has done work for E.ON. The third commissioner stated he was not in office at the time. These are puzzling statements from people who seem to support a wind installation for our county and are in control of making it happen.
Most of those in favor of the Wildcat wind project either are under contract with E.ON or are not at risk of having to live near them. These same people have said other Indiana counties with wind “farms” have been surveyed and have given positive feedback. An ignored fact is that Benton County has one-tenth the population of Howard County. One can drive for miles in Benton County without seeing a house.
We believe Howard County is too heavily populated for wind turbines and have respectfully asked our commissioners to change the setbacks to comply with the World Health Organization standards. This is fair and reasonable, as these standards were determined by studies of wind energy installations all over the globe. We believe that if one of us has our quality of life infringed upon by the proposed wind turbines, it is too many.
As they become educated about the repercussions of wind farms, more people have joined our fight to change the county setbacks. For more information see www.easternhowardwind.com.
County population too big for turbines
- Bailout was necessary In September 2008, Congress approved a $25 billion loan program for Detroit's Big Three. The money was offered to help U.S. automakers develop more fuel-efficient vehicles. Three months later, representatives from Chrysler, General Motors and Ford re
- Dec. 12, 2013: Letters to the editor 'Thanks to greed and ignorance' Large-scale wind turbine arrays, like the one near Windfall and those planned for Howard County, cause significant harm to wildlife, people and the environment. In return, because of wind's low density, intermittency a
- JEFFREY McCALL: TV news blunders diminish public support Network television news executives wanting to know why ratings continue to decline can find the ready answer in a growing string of professional blunders within their industry. Polls show public confidence in network television news is eroding. Audie
- JANE HARDISTY: Long live the soil Too often, it's treated like dirt. But last week our living and life-giving soil finally got some of the respect it deserves as the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization celebrated World Soil Day on Dec. 5 in Rome. Under the framework of
- 3-dog nights imperil dogs It could've been a concerned citizen. It could've been someone looking for a laugh. Little information was available concerning a would-be animal rescue in the tiny town of Center nearly six years ago. Emergency officials were dispatched just before
- Dec. 11, 2013: Letters to the editor Courts should rule in adherence to law A recent, troubling ruling by our local judiciary went against the City of Kokomo, which was trying to close a "gentlemen's club" for violation of a zoning law. The club operated in a building in which a wall di
House of Burgess: Amazon's flying delivery robots
In a Dec. 1 “60 Minutes” piece on CBS — charitably labeled an Amazon.com “infomercial” by Slate’s Konstantin Kakeas Dec. 2 — CEO Jeff Bezos gave Charlie Rose an exclusive look at what’s next for the company, which had $61 billion in revenue in 2012. “These are ‘octocopters,’” said Bezos near the end of the segment, as he showed a saucer-eyed Rose a table of “autonomous” black, toddler-sized contraptions.
- DAN COATS: America's major policy shift on Iran In a recent address to the nation, President Barack Obama acknow-ledged Iran "has been unwilling to meet its obligations to the interna-tional community." In the same speech the president vowed to "prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon." But t
- A harbinger of frustration A move by the State Board of Education to adopt new rules for educator licensing illustrates just how little influence the state's schools superintendent, Glenda Ritz, has in slowing down the reforms of former schools chief Tony Bennett. The board's
- Dec. 10, 2013: Letters to the editor CRD members have 1 issue: themselves It took two letters to make two things apparent from the reaction to Ms. Rayl's recent letter: 1) Mr. Carney's biggest concern is that we should all uphold the law and; 2) The CRD (Citizens for Responsible Develop
- More Opinion Headlines