Let residents voteon wind farm issue
As the wind farms, with all the controversy around them, approach the Greentown area, it makes one wonder what brought them here to begin with? With the number of people who live in the country, and with some of the best farmland in the world, why put wind farms here?
It is a good idea to harness the wind and make its power work for us, because it is almost always blowing (especially in Washington, D.C.). But this area is a poor location. Why not put them out on the Western plains and deserts or mountains, where the wind really blows and there are relatively few people to be affected by them.
If there are wind farms already out there, build more. A lot of turbines could be placed in those areas.
It has been said that a landowner cannot be stopped by other landowners from using his land however he wants. That would be true, as long as the landowner doesn’t use his land in an extreme and excessive way.
Putting up 350-foot towers with moving parts and red blinking lights across the road from other landowners would seem to be an extreme and excessive use of the landowner’s property. Such usage would seem to logically affect the other landowners in an extreme and excessive way, unavoidably altering their pursuit and realization of what is accepted and acknowledged as a normal life.
No landowner should be required to defend and possibly relinquish what they perceive as an acceptable standard of quality for their lives, when that quality is jeopardized by the other landowner’s deliberately extreme and excessive use of land that brought about the challenge in the first place.
I believe certain issues should be decided by the people directly, and the wind farm issue is one of them. It should be taken out of the hands of a few — the zoning and appeals boards, the plan commissions, the county commissioners, and any court where the issue might wind up. The people affected by the wind farms should be allowed to vote directly.