The 2010 census reported some 0.77 percent of households in same-sex relationships, and the best studies on the matter pinpoint no measureable economic conse-quences for good or ill in such arrangements. The condition of same-sex marriage or household arrangements possesses no economic consequences. However, the debate itself does have consequences because it crowds out honest deliberation on the real problems of collapsing families. These problems carry with them enormous fiscal and social costs that demand deep attention.
The world was an imperfect place in the 1950s, but fewer than 1 in 20 children were born to unmarried mothers. While the 1950s were a time when women and minorities were especially disadvantaged, the much-welcomed gains of civil rights were accompanied by a startling collapse of family conditions, which in turn erased many of the gains in individual freedom.
A half-century ago, a smaller share of black children were born to unmarried mothers than those that were born to unwed whites, but for both groups the numbers were small, below 5 percent. Today, 6 in 10 black kids and 4 in 10 white kids are born to incomplete families. The absence of a parent and the financial hardship of these families are devastating to our nation’s fiscal, economic and social health.
The economic outcomes for children of single moms are dismal. Virtually all long-term poverty, most welfare payments, most Medicaid and other forms of social assistance go to such families. So, too, higher costs of schooling and incarceration. Indeed, if we could erase the costs of unwed parenting, our budget would instantly run a dramatic surplus. By my reckoning we’d save just under $1 trillion in federal spending per year and probably another $1 trillion in state spending. It is a bigger annual cost than any other budget outlay, including wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Moreover, these kids fail in school and in life at rates far higher than their peers, perpetuating the problems.