The issue: The American Library Association is celebrating Banned Books Week.
Our view: The freedom to read is a cornerstone of American democracy.
This is Banned Books Week, an annual observance intended to underscore the freedom Americans have to read whatever they choose, including books that others might seek to ban.
A library in Derry, N.H., plastered red tape across the faces of famous authors such as Maya Angelou and Raold Dahl whose works have been challenged.
The list of banned books includes age-old favorites such as “Alice in Wonderland” along with more recent selections such as the Harry Potter series. Then, there are the banned books everyone has heard about, such as J.D. Salinger’s “The Catcher in the Rye” and Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
A library in Kingston, N.H., had a banned books party this week where kids could have their mug shots taken next to their favorite banned book.
Since 1990, the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom has recorded more than 10,000 book challenges. Roughly three out of every four recorded challenges involve material in schools or school libraries, and the library association estimates that only about a third of challenges are actually reported.
Most folks who seek to limit access to books have good intentions. They object to the language in the book or perhaps even the politics. They might see the book as too racy or maybe even sacrilegious.
They might even be parents concerned that a particular book might be inappropriate for their own children.
Parents, of course, should have that choice. They should be able to decide what books their own children can read.
But they shouldn’t be making that choice for everyone else’s children.
You say the book is too controversial? Well, let us just read a few pages and decide for ourselves.