Perhaps the law could be written a little more plainly, but that is a legislative function. The judiciary is charged with applying existing law to a problem, including the one at hand. If we are to have a legitimate judiciary, we must have rulings that adhere to existing laws.
Why Indiana needs amendment on ban
Just when it seems things couldn’t get worse for the Republican Party, along comes more bad news: Gay couples in the United States have increased at a rapid rate, and Kokomo’s mayor, Greg Goodnight, voices his opposition to House Joint Resolution 6, an amendment that would add language to the state’s constitution stating only marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid.
Mayor Goodnight states “Indiana already has a state law in place banning same sex marriage.” So did the state of Iowa. Iowa’s Republican platform was calling for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage. Along comes Lambda Legal, a New York-based gay rights organization that filed a lawsuit on behalf of six gay and lesbian couples in Iowa.
In its decision, the Supreme Court of Iowa upheld an August 2007 decision by a judge who found that a state law limiting marriage to a man and a woman violates the constitutional rights of equal protection.
Mayor Goodnight said, “Why would we want to change the constitution on something that is already prohibited?” Many citizens in Iowa are asking the same question now.
Myron D. Brubaker